In recent times, surgical approaches have seen the rise of two groundbreaking techniques that have revolutionised the way surgeries are performed – Laparoscopic Surgery and Robotic Surgery. Each brings its own set of advantages and caters to diverse medical needs. Are these approaches the same or different? While the approach is similar, there are notable differences between laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Let us understand these cutting-edge approaches slightly better.
Laparoscopic surgery, often referred to as minimally invasive surgery, involves making small incisions through which a laparoscope (a thin, flexible tube with a light and camera). The surgeon navigates and performs the procedure while watching a video monitor, using specialised instruments.
Example: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a minimally invasive approach to gallbladder removal.
Robotic surgery can just be termed as an advanced approach to laparoscopy. It takes a step further by employing a surgical robot which is controlled by a surgeon. The robotic system provides enhanced visualisation and precision, thereby amplifying the surgeon’s capabilities through advanced technology.
Example: Robotic-assisted prostatectomy, a minimally invasive option for prostate removal.
Some basic similarities between the two are small incisions, an inside view of the surgical location, shorter hospital stay, better control of the process and improved clinical outcomes. However, when you go deeper you notice there are subtle but clinically impactful differences that differentiate the two. Now, let us explore some of the differences of each approach:
Laparoscopic Surgery | Robotic Surgery |
Tiny incisions that allow for camera and small instruments | Tiny incisions that allow for a camera, small instruments & endo wrist instruments |
The surgeon stands over the patient | The surgeon sits at the surgeon’s console |
The surgeon operates with instruments that have been inserted into the incision | The surgeon operates on the console, while the technology helps mimic his actions in the patient body in real time |
Lowered range of motion when compared to robotic surgery | Robotic instruments and arms have a full 360-degree motion range. This makes robotic arms more dexterous than even the human hand enhancing the surgeon’s capability |
Better control and access to tricky places than open surgery | Uncomparable control and access to difficult-to-reach and delicate regions is easier. |
Recovery time is shorter than open surgery | Shortest recovery time and enhanced clinical outcomes. |
Reduced risk of blood loss and infections | The minimised risk of blood loss and infections due to the cauterisation process helps carry out organ removal or reconstruction surgeries with the least patient discomfort. |
In conclusion, both laparoscopic and robotic surgeries represent remarkable advancements in the field of minimally invasive procedures. While laparoscopy has been a transformative approach, robotic surgery elevates precision and dexterity to unprecedented levels. The choice between the two depends on the specific procedure, surgeon’s expertise, and patient factors.
At the CK Birla Hospital, we pride ourselves on offering cutting-edge surgical solutions, ensuring that our patients receive the most advanced and personalised care. Our team of skilled surgeons, equipped with state-of-the-art technology, is committed to providing you with the best possible outcomes.
Choose excellence. Choose innovation. Choose CK Birla Hospital for your surgical needs.